Demo · synthetic data
Review a survey the way Imole Intelligence is designed to.
- 01Pick the next finding in the queue
- 02Check the evidence and why it ranks there
- 03Confirm, dismiss or escalate it
- 04Read the draft review summary
Before and after · illustration
Hours of footage, or a short queue.
Concept illustration. It shows how the work changes, not measured Imole timing. No speed or accuracy figures are claimed.
Before · manual review
Scrub every hour of video and sonar
A reviewer watches the full survey from start to end and works out which few moments matter. Most of the time goes on footage where nothing needs attention.
After · ranked by Imole Intelligence (concept)
Start with a ranked review queue
The same footage arrives as a short list ordered by priority, each finding tied to its position and frames. The reviewer still makes every decision; the time goes to the findings, not to searching.
Review queue, highest priority first
No finding selected
Choose a finding from the queue or a marker on the route.
Marker size shows priority. Segment criticality (C1 to C3) and the ranking rule (severity × criticality × confidence) are simplified for this demo; they are not Imole's method. Background notes paraphrase public sources: ICPC (iscpc.org), the ITU International Advisory Body for Submarine Cable Resilience (2026), Mauldin, Burdette and Constable (2025), and Kinsey, Eustice and Whitcomb (2006).